How legally exploitable are lower-class tenants in Michigan? It’s an empirical question, and one that has not been thoroughly researched (as far as my scan of Google Scholar can tell). Even so, it’s not difficult to imagine how landlords, in concert with unscrupulous attorneys, could shake down tenants for extra cash even if they are not substantially behind on their rent.

Consider, for instance, a tenant who may be lagging a week or two behind on their rent payments each month. Perhaps the landlord allows for a grace period, imposing a late fee on the tenant, or not. Either way, should the tenant fall outside of the grace period, even by a day, they could be subject to a landlord-tenant claim whereby the landlord, through their attorney, attempts to collect not only back rent, but the costs associated with the case, including statutory attorney’s fees, typically $75.00. See MCL 600.5759(1). That may not sound like much, but attorneys, sometimes representing multiple landlords in a particular area, will go into court on a given day with 10-15 tenant defendants and proceed to mow through them, picking up $750-1,000+ in attorney fees for approximately an hour or two’s worth of work. Not too shabby.

Granted, some of those cases will be for a legitimately concerning amount of back rent, but they needn’t be. Some tenants will show up to court, already paid up, and still be pressured into signing consent judgments that leave them on the hook for the costs associated with needless litigation, including attorney fees. Few, if any, of these tenants will push back and almost none hire a lawyer. If the average cost and attorney fees in, say, cases involving demand for possession come out to no more than $200, most will pay that amount in order to avoid the situation escalating. Of course, some, in doing so, put themselves back in the hole down the line and once again find themselves the subject of an arguably frivolous action where, once again, they will find themselves liable for costs and fees.

Again, $200 (which includes the $75 attorney fee) may not sound like much, but for lower-income tenants whose rent may not amount to more than $400 a month, it’s a big deal. Moreover, regardless of the capacity to pay, the idea that landlords and their attorneys can effect game the system to generate cheap revenue should offend anyone’s sensibilities. It is not what the legal system is for and the district courts quickly lose their character as “the people’s courts” and instead become forums for exploitation.

Proudly Serving West Michigan

Kent County, Allegan County, Ottawa County, Muskegon County, Calhoun County, Barry County. No matter the legal needs, you’ll benefit from a free consultation and assessment.

Contact Us

(616) 202-2505

Business Hours


Mon-Fri: 9am – 5pm
Weekends: By Appointment


Member, American Bar Association



Latest News

No, Bedbugs Are Not like Mosquitos

While summer is winding down in West Michigan, many may have noticed an uptick in mosquitos in the area. Though annoying, these minor pests are not long for this world. Fall, then winter, will soon be upon us and many will be longing for the days when a mosquito bite...

Should I Add Someone To My Bank Account

Most people possess one or more bank accounts. Normally, we can handle our finances without assistance. However, there are times in our lives when age, illness, or other circumstances prevent us from managing our financial affairs. Generally, this affects us most when...

Brief Tips on Battling Debt Collectors

One thing I often find myself saying to clients is, “Don’t throw away anything!”, particularly if they are being pursued by a debt collector or collection attorney. Although people being sent threatening letters likely have little interest in reading them, those...

Defend Against a Debt Collection Suit

There is a common misconception among debtors, lawyers, and judges that when someone is sued on a debt, say medical or consumer debt, that they not only owe that debt, but they have no valid defenses or counterclaims against the party suing them. In today’s...

Help Save the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is under attack. Enacted in 1991 for the express purpose of protecting consumers from telemarketer harassment and so-called “robocalls,” the Act has become a powerful tool for consumer-protection attorneys to discipline...